The Kent Yam09 cams are only a tiny bit more wild than the stock 850 inlet cam. the 850 cam will fit the 900. the exhaust is a similar casting, BUT has a cam position sensor on the left hand end. I will fit an 850 inlet and probably regrind the 900 exhaust too 850 inlet spec
when Kent regrind the stock cams, whether its for an 850 or 900 the base circle is reduced a fair bit which requires much thicker shims, not a problem relay a think some Honda ones fit.
The Kent inlet cam is not really much that wilder than the stock 850 inlet, they quote their cam figures at either seat to seat which is 300 degrees OR at 1mm lift where it is 240 degrees, the stock 850 inlet is 236 degrees at 1mm.
What you are paying for is a quite a bit wilder ex cam profile. I have dynoed an 850 with Kent cams and it picked up 3hp ( just under 5%) at the top end, this is what one would expect as the " under the curve" area is 5% more than the 850 inlet
my 900 has had the ecu re-flashed, it runs very well, I dynoed it with stock cans with the CAT removed and got 77.5hp rear wheel. I changed to set of Scorpion slip ons mainly to narrow the back end of the bike, the power has dropped by 0.6hp at 7000rpm ( different day acceptable dyno error) however the one thing that the de-catted stock pipes and all properly set up slip ons bring to the party, is vastly improved throttle response.
this year will bring 850 spec cams, re-cut valve seats, and squish properly set up.
my 850 which I built 7 years ago is still running with a 0.030''/0.75mm squish and has done 20,000 miles, the man who it is on the TRX 750 forum.
getting a 900 to where Yamaha designed it ( what people call blueprinting, but as all design is done on a very complex engine simulation and design program, maybe it should be called CAD-printing now) is relatively easy to accomplish, will yield benefits in fuel economy, part throttle response, and torque.
H